• Assessing Soft Skills

    Comments
    scissors

    Thinking about this weekends upcoming event UKYouthOnline has got me thinking again about OnTheUp. OnTheUp was the idea that came out of ‘Personal Development Reports‘ that I originally submitted to the Social Innovation Camp earlier in the year. I haven’t yet managed to dedicate the time to developing the idea further as I’d have hoped, and in retrospect I think that perhaps the Social Innovation Camp experience slightly hampered development in that what started out as an attempt to develop a tool to support informal learning became more focussed on being able to somehow develop this into ‘the next big website’.

    I do think online technology could be a brilliant tool for ’solving’ this problem – but it needs a bit more thought than just banging out a site. So I’ve gone right back to the start to have a think about what that problem actually is.

    I first became aware that there was a ‘problem’ quite early on in the development of the Young Movers programme. Young Movers was initially based on a loose remit of creating a programme for young people in citizenship. My take on this was to try and develop a programme that would help young people to become ‘good citizens’ – this meaning they would be the sort of people any community would be proud of and who would have the skills to make positive contributions to those communities. Hence my first interest in the ‘wooly world’ of ’soft skills’!

    In the early courses we ran we used various outdoor (adventurous) activities. Afterall everyone knows outdoor activities are the best way to develop confidence, leadership etc. Now I love abseiling – early in my working life I spent a couple of summers happily throwing all sorts of people down ropes, and it was very satisfying, reassuring people who were very scared, to actually get to the bottom. In those early Young Movers courses though I felt differently – I really struggled with how young people would actually be able to transfer what they got from the experience of completing an abseil, into the confidence they would need in real life situations back home. They undeniably got a high from completing an abseil, but I just couldn’t make the link between them doing that, to being able to ‘bottle up’ what they got from it and making it into a genuinely useful experience.

    My solution at the time was to stop using these activities and instead to develop alternative activities that were still challenging and enjoyable, but that had more direct relevance to being able to organise projects/activities.

    The problem came again though years later. This time it was from my first hand observations of being able to see young people develop in all sorts of ways, and from all sorts of testaments from young people themselves and those working with them somehow attributing their personal successes back to their experiences with us. All very nice to hear – but how do you prove what those benefits actually were?

    My experience at Social Innovation Camp was fascinating, largely because probably above any other project my idea was the “what the f**k is that about?!” project. Basically people who work in informal education would see this as a familiar problem (and frustration), but to anyone else they just didn’t get it until having had a very lengthy explanation (much like this post is becoming!).

    Anyway to help package my thoughts I’ve created a slideshow. I have started to have some good thoughts about how to approach this now (but more on that in the future!), but maybe you have ideas too – if so please do share them.

    [Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

    Tags: , , , , ,
  • Ade
    interesting idea but I am not sure I am entirely comfortable with the premise of using citizenship to create 'good citizens' - who are employable and will volunteer. For a society to develop effectively, its citizens have to be capable of engaing in processess both positively and negatively as long they have a critical understanding of the wider society.

    I know V is very interested in the link beteween volunteering and employability, so it might be useful to speak to them about this?
  • mas
    'Employability' isn't quite so much my focus as trying to illustrate the value of soft skills and more importantly find ways to help ensure that in programmes for young people that claim to develop things like 'leadership', 'assertiveness' & so on, that they actually are, and that they do so in a way that is relevant to the needs of the young people involved.

    For example for our course evaluations I've always said that feedback that says "I'm more confident" isn't necessarily good feedback - confident to do what? - confident to do certain teambuilding activities or confident to deal with issues back home?

    I'm a bit bemused that you wouldn't want to use citizenship to create good 'citizens' - isn't that the point?!

    I don't see volunteering as a route to employment - while I accept that it often can be, I think there needs to be much more consideration given to the idea of people volunteering simply because they want to - however in terms of youth provision, providing a programme without concern for helping participants to develop useful skills seems like a wasted opportunity to me.
blog comments powered by Disqus